import re from dataclasses import dataclass from typing import Any, Dict, Generator, List, Optional, Union from langchain_core.language_models import BaseChatModel from langchain_core.messages import AIMessage, BaseMessage, HumanMessage, SystemMessage from langchain_core.tools import BaseTool from ra_aid.console.output import cpm from ra_aid.exceptions import ToolExecutionError from ra_aid.fallback_handler import FallbackHandler from ra_aid.logging_config import get_logger from ra_aid.models_params import DEFAULT_TOKEN_LIMIT from ra_aid.tools.reflection import get_function_info logger = get_logger(__name__) @dataclass class ChunkMessage: content: str status: str def validate_function_call_pattern(s: str) -> bool: """Check if a string matches the expected function call pattern. Validates that the string represents a valid function call with: - Function name consisting of word characters, underscores or hyphens - Opening/closing parentheses with balanced nesting - Arbitrary arguments inside parentheses - Optional whitespace Args: s: String to validate Returns: bool: False if pattern matches (valid), True if invalid """ pattern = r"^\s*[\w_\-]+\s*\([^)(]*(?:\([^)(]*\)[^)(]*)*\)\s*$" return not re.match(pattern, s, re.DOTALL) class CiaynAgent: """Code Is All You Need (CIAYN) agent that uses generated Python code for tool interaction. The CIAYN philosophy emphasizes direct code generation and execution over structured APIs: - Language model generates executable Python code snippets - Tools are invoked through natural Python code rather than fixed schemas - Flexible and adaptable approach to tool usage through dynamic code - Complex workflows emerge from composing code segments Code Generation & Function Calling: - Dynamic generation of Python code for tool invocation - Handles complex nested function calls and argument structures - Natural integration of tool outputs into Python data flow - Runtime code composition for multi-step operations ReAct Pattern Implementation: - Observation: Captures tool execution results - Reasoning: Analyzes outputs to determine next steps - Action: Generates and executes appropriate code - Reflection: Updates state and plans next iteration - Maintains conversation context across iterations Core Capabilities: - Dynamic tool registration with automatic documentation - Sandboxed code execution environment - Token-aware chat history management - Comprehensive error handling and recovery - Streaming interface for real-time interaction - Memory management with configurable limits """ def __init__( self, model: BaseChatModel, tools: list[BaseTool], max_history_messages: int = 50, max_tokens: Optional[int] = DEFAULT_TOKEN_LIMIT, config: Optional[dict] = None, ): """Initialize the agent with a model and list of tools. Args: model: The language model to use tools: List of tools available to the agent max_history_messages: Maximum number of messages to keep in chat history max_tokens: Maximum number of tokens allowed in message history (None for no limit) config: Optional configuration dictionary """ if config is None: config = {} self.config = config self.provider = config.get("provider", "openai") self.model = model self.tools = tools self.max_history_messages = max_history_messages self.max_tokens = max_tokens self.available_functions = [] for t in tools: self.available_functions.append(get_function_info(t.func)) self.tool_failure_current_provider = None self.tool_failure_current_model = None self.fallback_handler = FallbackHandler(config, tools) def _build_prompt(self, last_result: Optional[str] = None) -> str: """Build the prompt for the agent including available tools and context.""" base_prompt = "" if last_result is not None: base_prompt += f"\n{last_result}" # Add available functions section functions_list = "\n\n".join(self.available_functions) # Build the complete prompt without f-strings for the static parts base_prompt += ( """ You are a ReAct agent. You run in a loop and use ONE of the available functions per iteration, but you will be called in a loop, so you will be able to accomplish the task over many iterations. The result of that function call will be given to you in the next message. Call one function at a time. Function arguments can be complex objects, long strings, etc. if needed. The user cannot see the results of function calls, so you have to explicitly use a tool like ask_human if you want them to see something. You must always respond with a single line of python that calls one of the available tools. Use as many steps as you need to in order to fully complete the task. Start by asking the user what they want. You must carefully review the conversation history, which functions were called so far, returned results, etc., and make sure the very next function call you make makes sense in order to achieve the original goal. You are expected to use as many steps as necessary to completely achieve the user's request, making many tool calls along the way. Think hard about what the best *next* tool call is, knowing that you can make as many calls as you need to after that. You typically don't want to keep calling the same function over and over with the same parameters. You must ONLY use ONE of the following functions (these are the ONLY functions that exist): """ + functions_list + """ You may use any of the above functions to complete your job. Use the best one for the current step you are on. Be efficient, avoid getting stuck in repetitive loops, and do not hesitate to call functions which delegate your work to make your life easier. But you MUST NOT assume tools exist that are not in the above list, e.g. write_file_tool. Consider your task done only once you have taken *ALL* the steps required to complete it. --- EXAMPLE BAD OUTPUTS --- This tool is not in available functions, so this is a bad tool call: write_file_tool(...) This tool call has a syntax error (unclosed parenthesis, quotes), so it is bad: write_file_tool("asdf This tool call is bad because it includes a message as well as backticks: Sure, I'll make the following tool call to accomplish what you asked me: ``` list_directory_tree('.') ``` This tool call is bad because the output code is surrounded with backticks: ``` list_directory_tree('.') ``` The following is bad becasue it makes the same tool call multiple times in a row with the exact same parameters, for no reason, getting stuck in a loop: list_directory_tree('.') list_directory_tree('.') The following is bad because it makes more than one tool call in one response: list_directory_tree('.') read_file_tool('README.md') # Now we've made request_research_and_implementation(\"\"\" Example query. \"\"\") This is good output because it uses a multiple line string when needed and properly calls the tool, does not output backticks or extra information: run_programming_task(\"\"\" # Example Programming Task Implement a widget factory satisfying the following requirements: - Requirement A - Requirement B ... \"\"\") As an agent, you will carefully plan ahead, carefully analyze tool call responses, and adapt to circumstances in order to accomplish your goal. You will make as many tool calls as you feel necessary in order to fully complete the task. We're entrusting you with a lot of autonomy and power, so be efficient and don't mess up. You have often been criticized for: - Making the same function calls over and over, getting stuck in a loop. DO NOT CLAIM YOU ARE FINISHED UNTIL YOU ACTUALLY ARE! Output **ONLY THE CODE** and **NO MARKDOWN BACKTICKS**""" ) return base_prompt def _execute_tool(self, msg: BaseMessage) -> str: """Execute a tool call and return its result.""" cpm(f"execute_tool msg: { msg }") code = msg.content globals_dict = {tool.func.__name__: tool.func for tool in self.tools} try: code = code.strip() logger.debug(f"_execute_tool: stripped code: {code}") # if the eval fails, try to extract it via a model call if validate_function_call_pattern(code): functions_list = "\n\n".join(self.available_functions) code = _extract_tool_call(code, functions_list) logger.debug( f"_execute_tool: evaluating code: {code} with globals: {list(globals_dict.keys())}" ) result = eval(code.strip(), globals_dict) logger.debug(f"_execute_tool: result: {result}") return result except Exception as e: error_msg = f"Error: {str(e)} \n Could not excute code: {code}" tool_name = self.extract_tool_name(code) raise ToolExecutionError(error_msg, base_message=msg, tool_name=tool_name) def extract_tool_name(self, code: str) -> str: match = re.match(r"\s*([\w_\-]+)\s*\(", code) if match: return match.group(1) return "" def _create_agent_chunk(self, content: str) -> Dict[str, Any]: """Create an agent chunk in the format expected by print_agent_output.""" return {"agent": {"messages": [AIMessage(content=content)]}} def _create_error_chunk(self, content: str) -> Dict[str, Any]: """Create an error chunk in the format expected by print_agent_output.""" message = ChunkMessage(content=content, status="error") return {"tools": {"messages": [message]}} @staticmethod def _estimate_tokens(content: Optional[Union[str, BaseMessage]]) -> int: """Estimate number of tokens in content using simple byte length heuristic. Estimates 1 token per 2.0 bytes of content. For messages, uses the content field. Args: content: String content or Message object to estimate tokens for Returns: int: Estimated number of tokens, 0 if content is None/empty """ if content is None: return 0 if isinstance(content, BaseMessage): text = content.content else: text = content # create-react-agent tool calls can be lists if isinstance(text, List): text = str(text) if not text: return 0 return len(text.encode("utf-8")) // 2.0 def _trim_chat_history( self, initial_messages: List[Any], chat_history: List[Any] ) -> List[Any]: """Trim chat history based on message count and token limits while preserving initial messages. Applies both message count and token limits (if configured) to chat_history, while preserving all initial_messages. Returns concatenated result. Args: initial_messages: List of initial messages to preserve chat_history: List of chat messages that may be trimmed Returns: List[Any]: Concatenated initial_messages + trimmed chat_history """ # First apply message count limit if len(chat_history) > self.max_history_messages: chat_history = chat_history[-self.max_history_messages :] # Skip token limiting if max_tokens is None if self.max_tokens is None: return initial_messages + chat_history # Calculate initial messages token count initial_tokens = sum(self._estimate_tokens(msg) for msg in initial_messages) # Remove messages from start of chat_history until under token limit while chat_history: total_tokens = initial_tokens + sum( self._estimate_tokens(msg) for msg in chat_history ) if total_tokens <= self.max_tokens: break chat_history.pop(0) return initial_messages + chat_history def stream( self, messages_dict: Dict[str, List[Any]], config: Dict[str, Any] = None ) -> Generator[Dict[str, Any], None, None]: """Stream agent responses in a format compatible with print_agent_output.""" initial_messages = messages_dict.get("messages", []) chat_history = [] last_result = None first_iteration = True while True: base_prompt = self._build_prompt(None if first_iteration else last_result) chat_history.append(HumanMessage(content=base_prompt)) full_history = self._trim_chat_history(initial_messages, chat_history) response = self.model.invoke( [ SystemMessage( "Execute efficiently yet completely as a fully autonomous agent." ) ] + full_history ) try: logger.debug(f"Code generated by agent: {response.content}") last_result = self._execute_tool(response) chat_history.append(response) first_iteration = False yield {} except ToolExecutionError as e: fallback_response = self.fallback_handler.handle_failure(e, self) print(f"fallback_response={fallback_response}") if fallback_response: hm = HumanMessage( content="The fallback handler has fixed your tool call results are in the last System message." ) chat_history.extend(fallback_response) chat_history.append(hm) logger.debug("Appended fallback response to chat history.") yield {} else: yield self._create_error_chunk(str(e)) # yield {"messages": [fallback_response[-1]]} # chat_history.append( # HumanMessage( # content=f"Your tool call caused an error: {e}\n\nPlease correct your tool call and try again." # ) # ) def _extract_tool_call(code: str, functions_list: str) -> str: from ra_aid.tools.expert import get_model model = get_model() prompt = f""" I'm conversing with a AI model and requiring responses in a particular format: A function call with any parameters escaped. Here is an example: ``` run_programming_task("blah \" blah\" blah") ``` The following tasks are allowed: {functions_list} I got this invalid response from the model, can you format it so it becomes a correct function call? ``` {code} ``` """ response = model.invoke(prompt) response = response.content pattern = r"([\w_\-]+)\((.*?)\)" matches = re.findall(pattern, response, re.DOTALL) if len(matches) == 0: raise ToolExecutionError("Failed to extract tool call") ma = matches[0][0].strip() mb = matches[0][1].strip().replace("\n", " ") return f"{ma}({mb})"